\documentclass[handout]{beamer}

% Copyright 2003 by Till Tantau <tantau@cs.tu-berlin.de>.
%
% This program can be redistributed and/or modified under the terms
% of the LaTeX Project Public License Distributed from CTAN
% archives in directory macros/latex/base/lppl.txt.

\usetheme{CambridgeUS}
%\useoutertheme{miniframes}
\usecolortheme{shark}

\usepackage[english]{babel}             % multiple languages, German Umlauts
\usepackage[latin1]{inputenc}           % character encoding
\usepackage{lingmacros}                 % 'enumsentence' environment
\usepackage{pstricks,graphicx,latexsym} % color, graphics, and special characters
\usepackage{natbib}
\setbeamercovered{highly dynamic}       % covered items appear dynamically transparent

%\setbeamertemplate{navigation symbols}{}
\setbeamertemplate{caption}[numbered]

\setbeameroption{show notes}
%\setbeameroption{hide notes}
%\setbeameroption{show only notes} Include only the notes in the output file and suppresses all frames. This options is useful for printing them.

\logo{\includegraphics[height=1cm]{palme.pdf}}

\newrgbcolor{myred}{.8 0 0}
\newrgbcolor{mygreen}{0 .8 0}
\newrgbcolor{mygray}{.5 .5 .5}

\title[Visualizing and Presenting]{Visualizing and Presenting in Research and Teaching}
\subtitle{Example}
\author[S\"ohn]{Jan-Philipp Söhn}
\institute[SS 2008]{Uni T\"ubingen\\\textsf{jp.soehn@uni-tuebingen.de}}
\date{July 2nd, 2008}

% Delete this, if you do not want the table of contents to pop up at
% the beginning of each subsection:
\AtBeginSubsection[]
{
  \begin{frame}<beamer>{Gliederung}
    \tableofcontents[currentsection,currentsubsection]
  \end{frame}
}

\begin{document}

\begin{frame}
\titlepage
\end{frame}

\begin{frame}
\frametitle{Outline}
\tableofcontents[pausesections]
\end{frame}

\section{Intro}
\frame{
\frametitle{Course Goals}

\bigskip

\begin{itemize}
\item How to prepare scientific content for a presentation \medskip
\item How to prepare a presentation \medskip
\item What are the tools for visualization and how to use them \medskip
\item How to layout slides  \medskip
\item How to prepare slides with PowerPoint and \LaTeX 
\end{itemize}
}

\frame{\frametitle{Some Warm-up Questions}

\medskip

\begin{itemize}
\visible<1->{\item Did you already give a talk? \medskip }
\visible<2->{\item What are your experiences?   \medskip }
\visible<3->{\item What tools did you use? \medskip }
\visible<4->{\item What tools are there in principle?   \medskip }
\visible<5->{\item How did you prepare? }
\end{itemize}
}

\section{First Step}
\frame{\frametitle{First Step towards a Presentation: Your Topic}

\medskip

\begin{itemize}[<+-| alert@+>]
\item Assumption: You will have to present a given text. \medskip 
\item Question: How to work through this text? \medskip 
\item What does it mean to read, try to understand? \medskip 
   \begin{itemize}[<+-| alert@+>]
   \item Having the relevant background knowledge \smallskip 
   \item Being interested and curious 
   \end{itemize}
\end{itemize}
}

\section{Five Strategies}
\frame{\frametitle{Five Strategies towards Understanding}

\medskip

\begin{itemize}[<+-| alert@+>]
\item Metacognition \medskip 
\item Syntactico-semantic analysis \medskip 
\item Reduction \medskip 
\item Reconstruction \medskip 
\item Elaboration 
\end{itemize}
}

\subsection{Metacognition}
\frame{\frametitle{Metacognition}

\medskip
Reflexion about one's own mental actions:
\begin{itemize}[<+-| alert@+>]
\item Questions to oneself:
\begin{itemize}[<+-| alert@+>]
\item What do I know already about the topic?
\item What do I want do learn? (formulate concrete questions that can guide you through the reading process)
\item Do I need help (dictionaries etc.)?
\end{itemize}
\item Questions to the text:
\begin{itemize}[<+-| alert@+>]
\item What kind of text is it?
\item What can I expect?
\item What is the aspiration level?
\item What kind of (domain-specific) language?
\end{itemize}
\item What are my strategies to explore the content of the text? (order of reading, how to write anything down)
\end{itemize}

}

\subsection{Analyze}
\frame{\frametitle{Syntactico-semantic analysis}

\medskip

\begin{itemize}[<+-| alert@+>]
\item Technical term or every-day language?\bigskip 
\item Consult Wikipedia and domain-specific dictionaries/encyclopediae\bigskip 
\item Example: ``motivation''
\end{itemize}
}

\subsection{Reduce}
\frame{\frametitle{Reduce}

\medskip

Reduce text on its most important information: \medskip 
\begin{enumerate}[<+-| alert@+>]
\item Underline
\item Notes in the margin (structure of content vs. structure of reasoning)
\begin{itemize}[<+-| alert@+>]
\item Structure of content: consider each paragraph and write down a keyword $\rightarrow$ ``external memory''
\item Structure of reasoning: What is the line of argument (statement, reason, example, conclusion)?
\item Best: combination of these two!
\end{itemize}
\item Excerpting
\begin{enumerate}[<+-| alert@+>]
\item Excerpt
\begin{itemize}
\item Verbatim or paraphrase (rewriting sth.\ in one's own words is a very important step towards understanding it)
\item General or specific excerpt
\item General: What is the topic of the paragraph? What does it say about it?
\end{itemize}
\item Condense
\begin{itemize}
\item Summarize the summaries
\item Repeat
\end{itemize}
\end{enumerate}
\end{enumerate}
}

\subsection{Reconstruct}
\frame{\frametitle{Reconstruct}

\medskip
Visualize a text
\medskip
\begin{itemize}[<+-| alert@+>]

\item Concept mapping vs. \medskip 
\item Mind maps

\end{itemize}
}

\subsection{Elaborate}
\frame{\frametitle{Elaborate}

\medskip

\begin{itemize}[<+-| alert@+>]

\item Elaborate: ``produce something on your own'' \medskip 
\item No longer reader but reviewer \medskip 
\item Criteria: form and content

\end{itemize}
}
\frame{\frametitle{Scientific Best-Practice}

\medskip

\begin{itemize}[<+-| alert@+>]

\item What is the underlying question? Is it relevant? \medskip 
\item What methods are used? Are they appropriate? \medskip 
\item What are the premises of the author? \medskip 
\item Is the line of resoning conclusive? \medskip 
\item Did the author mention the relevant literature?\medskip 
\item Are the sources reliable? 

\end{itemize}
}


\frame{\frametitle{Ideological Background}

\medskip

\begin{itemize}[<+-| alert@+>]

\item What kind of results does the author look for? \medskip 
\item Why is the author interested in this topic? \medskip 
\item Who is the initiator? (author herself or third party) \medskip 
\item What is the author's perspective (politic, religious,...)? \medskip 
\item Is her ideologic position transparent? \medskip 
\item Are there any preferred values? \medskip 
\item Are they motivated or premised?

\end{itemize}
}


\frame{\frametitle{Claim of Validity}

\medskip

\small
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|}
\textbf{Category}& \textbf{Example}             & \textbf{Questions}\\\hline
about reality & ``The full-time school helps to & How?\\
							& increase social competence.''   & Is that true? Evidence?\\\hline
about values	& ``Freedom is the most import-   & What does it mean?\\
              & ant good of humanity''					& Objections? Is this desirable\\
              &																	& for everyone? Is this realizable?\\\hline
about means   & ``You should buy Hedge funds    & What can/must be done?\\
              & to minimize the risks of in-    & Premises? Objections?\\
              & vestment.''                     & Counterevidence?\\							
\end{tabular}
\end{center}

}

\frame{\frametitle{Types of Argumentation}

\medskip

\small
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|}
\textbf{Type}& \textbf{Strategy/Source}      & \textbf{Counterarguments}\\\hline
facts        & evidence, statistics, hard data& counterevidence, conflictive data\\\hline
experience   & case examples                 & oppositional experience\\\hline
values, rules& Source of information that is & criticize source\\
             & accepted as authority         & \\\hline
authority    & People whose influence is  	 & not accept authorities\\
             & acknowledged because of their & cite oppositional points of view\\
             & position/competence           & \\


\end{tabular}
\end{center}

}
\frame{\frametitle{Language}

\small
\begin{center}
\begin{tabular}{l|l}
\textbf{What the author writes:} & \textbf{What the author means:}\\\hline
As it is known...                & I think...\\\hline
It is clear that...              & I think...\\\hline
Maybe...								         & I don't know exactly...\\\hline
There is general agreement on... & Some people think that...\\\hline
For obvious reasons...           & I don't have any evidence\\\hline
There is no doubt...             & In my opinion...\\\hline
It is probable that...           & I don't have enough evidence\\\hline
It is not necessary to go into...& I don't want to go into...\\\hline
always, ever                     & often, usually\\\hline
every, nothing                   & most, few\\\hline
totally, absolutely              & quite, more or less\\\hline
\end{tabular}
\end{center}
}

\section{}

\frame{
\frametitle{}
\begin{center}
\begin{figure}
\includegraphics[width=5cm]{SMARTBoard.jpg}
\caption{A smartboard} \label{Smartboard}
\end{figure}
\end{center}
}

\frame{
\frametitle{Referencing}

\bigskip

This is to show that you can reference a figure with the $\backslash$ref command.
So, for an example of a Smartboard, see Figure \ref{Smartboard}.
\note[item]{Normally, one shouldn't have numbered figures or captions\\ in a presentation.}
\note[item]{However, on a handout, it makes sense.}
}

\frame{
\frametitle{Bibliography}

And this shows how you can cite references in the text \citep{Oppenrieder:91,Andro:Dale:00}.\medskip

\bibliographystyle{natbib.fullname}
\bibliography{references}
}

\section{Conclusion}
\frame{
\frametitle{Conclusion}
\begin{block}{Any Questions?}
\begin{center}
Consult beameruserguide.pdf!
\end{center}
\end{block}
}

\setbeamercolor{normal text}{bg=black}
\frame[plain]{}

\end{document}